Main

April 22, 2007

How Corrupt is Malcolm Gladwell?

Malcolm Gladwell is an influential New Yorker writer, the author of two best-sellers, "The Tipping Point" and “Blink.” In January the NYer published a Gladwell piece called "Open Secrets," a convoluted defense of Jeff Skilling and his fellow Enron execs. Joe Nocera of the New York Times expressed surprise that the renowned Gladwell could write something so inaccurate and slanted.

"Already 'Open Secrets' has been embraced by those who argue that the Enron prosecutions were an effort to 'criminalize' what amounted to flawed business decisions," wrote Nocera. "The efforts to weaken Sarbanes-Oxley are also rooted in the idea that the country overreacted to Enron and the other corporate scandals. In effect, the central defense argument -that Enron didn't really do anything illegal- has been given new life by Mr. Gladwell. And it isn't remotely true."

It should come as no surprise that Malcolm Gladwell is a corporate shill. In 1997 the New Yorker published his paean to hormone replacement therapy, “The Estrogen Question: How Wrong is Dr. Susan Love?,” in which Gladwell derided Love’s warning that HRT could cause breast cancer. (Love, a distinguished clinician and UCLA professor, had been publicizing The Nurse’s Health Study finding that women taking Wyeth’s Prempro had a higher rate of breast cancer.) Gladwell’s piece culminated in a plug for Eli Lilly’s new drug Raloxifene, which was about to be marketed as Evista. “Before very long,” wrote Gladwell, “women worried about raising their breast-cancer risk will have the option of taking a different kind of hormone that doesn’t affect their breasts at all —or that may even protect against breast cancer.”

Continue reading "How Corrupt is Malcolm Gladwell?" »

April 15, 2007

Medical News from the Business Pages

Two significant errors in one sentence marred a front-page story in the Wall St. Journal March 29 about the FDA's looming decision on Acomplia, a drug manufactured by Sanofi-Aventis. Acomplia reduces appetite by blocking one of the body's own cannabinoid receptors. The doubly misleading sentence began: "Cannabis, the active ingredient in marijuana, acts on the same receptors..."

"Cannabis" and "marijuana" are names of the same plant, which is also known as "hemp" (especially when grown for fiber from the stalk or oil from the seeds). Cannabis, the Latin name, was used widely by doctors who prescribed and drug companies that marketed herbal extracts in the U.S. in the late 19th and early 20th century. "Marijuana" is the colloquial term used by Hispanics in the southwestern U.S. who smoked it and were the primary targets of state and local prohibition laws. The Hearst press and the federal Bureau of Narcotics employed the Hispanic term, spelling it "marihuana." During the House Ways and Means Committee debate on marihuana prohibition in 1937, several representatives and witnesses expressed confusion over the terminology, observing that cannabis and hemp were being used in medicine and industry.

Continue reading "Medical News from the Business Pages" »

March 10, 2007

Cannabis for the Wounded

Another Walter Reed Scandal


Screaming Chris Mathews and the corporate media would have us believe that it's only the living conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center that are deplorable, not the medical care itself. Donna Shalala and Bob Dole have been assigned to investigate the situation. A superficial clean-up will ensue.

Out in California, doctors in the Society of Cannabis Clinicians question the care doled out at Walter Reed and other military hospitals where wounded soldiers and vets are treated with toxic medications while the safest painkiller known to man is systematically withheld. "If anybody needs and deserves cannabis-based medicine, it's the thousands of soldiers who have been seriously wounded in Iraq," says Philip A. Denney, MD. "Cannabis would help in treating insomnia, pain, PTSD, and a whole array of symptoms that wounded vets typically face."

Continue reading "Cannabis for the Wounded" »